Judges reject Alabama’s congressional lines, will draw new districts to increase Black voting power

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — Federal judges said Tuesday that they will draft new congressional lines for Alabama after lawmakers refused to create a second district where Black voters at least came close to comprising a majority, as suggested by the court.

In blocking the newly drawn congressional map, the three-judge panel wrote that they are “deeply troubled” that Alabama lawmakers flouted their instruction to create a second majority-Black district or something close to it. The panel directed a court-appointed special master to submit three proposed new maps by Sept. 25.

“The law requires the creation of an additional district that affords Black Alabamians, like everyone else, a fair and reasonable opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. The 2023 Plan plainly fails to do so,” the judges wrote in the ruling.

Alabama indicated in a court filing that it will ask the U.S. Supreme Court — which previously upheld the panel’s findings in the case — to put the order on hold while it appeals, according to a court filing.

“While we are disappointed in today’s decision, we strongly believe that the Legislature’s map complies with the Voting Rights Act and the recent decision of the U.S. Supreme Court,” Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s office said in a statement.

The Republican-controlled Alabama Legislature hastily drew new lines this summer after the U.S. Supreme Court in June upheld the panel’s finding that the map — that had one majority-Black district out of seven in a state where 27% of residents are Black — likely violated the U.S. Voting Rights Act.

The three-judge panel, in striking down Alabama’s map in 2022, said the state should have two districts where Black voters have an opportunity to elect their preferred candidates. Because of racially polarized voting in the state, that map would need to include a second district where Black voters are the majority or “something quite close,” the judges wrote.

Connexion utilisateur

Commentaires récents

  • APPEL DU PARQUET CONTRE LE JUGEMENT DES STATUES: LE “SUPREMACISME” JUDICIAIRE A ENCORE FRAPPE

    C'EST CA !

    Albè

    04/12/2025 - 08:57

    T'es plus intelligent que l'avocat Raphaël Constant, rédacteur de l'article, qui a plus de 40 ans Lire la suite

  • APPEL DU PARQUET CONTRE LE JUGEMENT DES STATUES: LE “SUPREMACISME” JUDICIAIRE A ENCORE FRAPPE

    Suprémacisme à toutes les sauces

    poi

    03/12/2025 - 16:25

    Le suprémacisme est une théorie RACIALE et RACISTE consistant à considérer EXPLICITEMENT qu' une Lire la suite

  • APPEL DU PARQUET CONTRE LE JUGEMENT DES STATUES: LE “SUPREMACISME” JUDICIAIRE A ENCORE FRAPPE

    CODE PENAL FRANCAIS

    Albè

    03/12/2025 - 12:53

    Le premier "suprémacisme" ne consiste--t-il pas à utiliser les outils juridiques du colonisateur Lire la suite

  • Et si un écrivain français, réfugié en Russie, écrivait que l'Alsace appartient à l'Allemagne ?

    ????

    Albè

    03/12/2025 - 09:29

    Quel rapport avec le fond de l'article ?

    Lire la suite
  • Sainte-Lucie : le Béké Allen Chastenet échoue à redevenir Premier ministre

    PETITE FAUTE DE FRAPPE

    Albè

    03/12/2025 - 09:24

    C'est "Chastanet" et non "Chastenet"...

    Lire la suite