House Passes Bill That Would Allow Puerto Rico to Vote on Its Statehood or Independence

The House passed a bill this Thursday that would allow Puerto Ricans to vote in the first-ever binding referendum to either join the U.S. as the 51st state, or gain independence.

Coined the Puerto Rico Status Act, the bill is not favored to pass in the Senate, but symbolizes progress toward the island territory’s long-sought dream of achieving more political autonomy. The measure was backed by the White House and passed with a bipartisan vote of 233 to 191, with 16 Republicans joining 217 Democrats in approval.

The House made a similar initiative more than 10 years ago, but this time it includes a requirement that the federal government honors the results of a referendum, whatever they may be.

“For far too long, the residents of Puerto Rico—over 3 million U.S. citizens—have been deprived of the opportunity to determine their own political future and have not received the full rights and benefits of their citizenship because they reside in a U.S. territory,” Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) and the bill’s 63 co-sponsors wrote. “H.R. 8393 [The Puerto Rico Status Act] would take a historic step towards righting this wrong by establishing a process to ascertain the will of the voters of Puerto Rico.”

Over the years, Puerto Rico has held seven referendums to gauge what type of political future its population wants, but none of them were binding and typically faced low voter turnout. In a 2020 referendum, 53% of Puerto Ricans voted for the island to become a state.

The Puerto Rico Status Act would include three options for voters to choose between at a referendum. The choices are to grant Puerto Rico statehood, to grant it independence or to grant it independence while retaining some U.S. affiliations. The bill also covers some procedures for how the changes could be implemented and designates resources for a voter education campaign.

The Puerto Rico Status Act would need at least 60 votes to break a Senate filibuster, which analysts are highly skeptical will occur. With Republicans poised to take control of the House in January, the measure appears to be a last-ditch effort to pursue Puerto Rican independence or statehood. The GOP generally doesn’t vie for Puerto Rican statehood, likely because of how the move might add more Democrat voters to the national electorate.

Following its colonization under Spain in the early 16th century, Puerto Rico became an American territory in 1898. The island has over three million inhabitants today. Puerto Ricans were granted American citizenship in 1917, but still lack representation in Congress and cannot vote in presidential elections.

Puerto Ricans also face restrictions for eligibility in some federal programs and typically don’t pay federal income taxes, but they can serve in the U.S. military and are subject to the draft. About 40% of Puerto Ricans live at or below the poverty line.

“Time’s up on pondering the political and economic consequences of Puerto Rican statehood, let alone being opposed to it,” Christina Ponsa-Krau, a Columbia law professor who specializes in American territorial expansion, wrote in an essay for the New York Times. “You don’t annex a place, make it your colony for nearly a century and a quarter, and then reject its people’s vote for statehood.”

Connexion utilisateur

Commentaires récents

  • Ibrahim Traoré, chef d'état du Burkina-Faso : "Au nom du peuple africain, au nom des peuples opprimés, je dis "Gaza vivra !"

    Traoré-la-Fripouille : Nveaux exploits

    troyag

    30/05/2026 - 05:06

    Entendons -nous bien :l'anti-impérialisme est en-soi qq chose de noble et de profondément respect Lire la suite

  • QUELQUES REFLEXIONS A PROPOS DES “REPARATIONS”

    parce que!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!crapule

    @Lidé

    30/05/2026 - 01:58

    les occidentaux doivent rembourser pour le crime de la traite transatlantique.point barre.
    Lire la suite

  • AMIS DE LA MORT, MAÎTRISONS NOTRE PEUR et RIONS UN PEU !

    civilisation!!

    @Lidé

    30/05/2026 - 01:51

    je parle de civilisation, parce que quand on discute avec des iraniens des chinois, on ressent d Lire la suite

  • AMIS DE LA MORT, MAÎTRISONS NOTRE PEUR et RIONS UN PEU !

    civilisation!!

    @Lidé

    30/05/2026 - 01:50

    je parle de civilisation, parce que quand on discute avec des iraniens des chinois, on ressent d Lire la suite

  • QUELQUES REFLEXIONS A PROPOS DES “REPARATIONS”

    Pourquoi ?

    troyag

    29/05/2026 - 21:25

    Pourquoi ,est-ce l'Occident SEUL qui doit se pencher sur les réparations ,alors que comme vous l Lire la suite

  • AMIS DE LA MORT, MAÎTRISONS NOTRE PEUR et RIONS UN PEU !

    @Lidé, il n’y a pas de mauvaise foi...

    Frédéric C.

    29/05/2026 - 17:08

    ...de ma part. Des incompréhensions, c’est probable. Mais "Mauvaise Foi" (MF)?... Hum! Lire la suite

  • Ibrahim Traoré, chef d'état du Burkina-Faso : "Au nom du peuple africain, au nom des peuples opprimés, je dis "Gaza vivra !"

    YUG, TU NE TROMPES PERSONNE !

    Albè

    29/05/2026 - 07:48

    S'il y a des "macoutes prédateurs" comme tu dis c'est que forcément il y a d'abord des "prédateur Lire la suite

  • Ibrahim Traoré, chef d'état du Burkina-Faso : "Au nom du peuple africain, au nom des peuples opprimés, je dis "Gaza vivra !"

    Drôle de raccourci !!

    troyag

    28/05/2026 - 21:07

    Ah bon ??? Lire la suite

  • Ibrahim Traoré, chef d'état du Burkina-Faso : "Au nom du peuple africain, au nom des peuples opprimés, je dis "Gaza vivra !"

    TROYAG C'EST...YUG !

    Albè

    28/05/2026 - 17:54

    L''énergumène se dissimule derrière les pseudos plus cons les un que les autres mais il ne trompe Lire la suite

  • Ibrahim Traoré, chef d'état du Burkina-Faso : "Au nom du peuple africain, au nom des peuples opprimés, je dis "Gaza vivra !"

    protégez-vous!!!

    @Lidé

    28/05/2026 - 16:31

    bande de cons, poutine va frapper, et cette fois les africains ne viendront pas !!!!!!!!!!!

    Lire la suite